WARMACHINE/HORDES > Factions de Hordes

[Colossals?] Hordes

<< < (3/33) > >>

darkshenker:
Une tortue géante sur 2 pattes avec des harnais remplis de cochons avec des fusils et des bazookas? ^^

SHWTD:
Mais foutez Schlaf et Allan au marketing quoi !!!! Quel génie !!!


 ;D

MotokoSempai:
@schlaf : bien trouvé  ;)


--- Citation de: darkshenker le 10 mars 2012 à 08:20:42 ---Le nom du colosse Skorne me motive pas là. On va se taper le seule colosse qui se déplace à 4 pattes? Moi qui révais d'un Tyranodon ou un truc du genre....
--- Fin de citation ---

J'ai cherché dans le Monsternomicon à quoi ressemblait un Mammoth est c'est clair que l'on est plus près d'un Tricératops que d'un Tyranodon...

Booggy:
A toute fin utile, je remets ici la précision apportée par Doug Seacat sur le chose Skorne :

--- Citation de: Booggy le 10 mars 2012 à 12:46:36 ---Precision de Doug Seacat sur le Mammoth Skorne :

I have been told by Professor Pendrake that he would like to apologize for an apparent misidentification of what he thought was a creature called a "Mammoth." Apparently his notes got a bit muddled. This is quite understandable given his recent exposure to the skorne language and not being entirely versed in the particulars. There is a skorne word meaning "tremendous sized beast" which is very similar to that applied to a specific creature that you have yet to see.

In other words, I would not base your preconceptions on what a Mammoth might be based on either the Monsternomicon II or the Witchfire Trilogy. And in general, as I have said repeatedly, looking at the old RPG stats for a given creature are not generally guaranteed to tell you much about how that creature will be interpreted in HORDES. Good examples of why this isn't a particularly great idea include both the Warpwolf and the Gorax but extend to many other creatures.

--- Fin de citation ---

MotokoSempai:
Arf je ne l'avait pas lu  :-[

Navigation

[0] Index des messages

[#] Page suivante

[*] Page précédente